Compensation Benchmarking in 2025: Powering Competitive Pay

Why Compensation Benchmarking Matters More Than Ever

A recent analysis by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) points to a stable yet tightening labor market as a defining feature of 2024 and 2025, and Aura data backs up that assessment.

Whereas compensation budgets jumped sharply during the 2021–2023 period, pay increases are leveling off somewhat—Mercer anticipates average pay raises of about 3.7% for 2025, WTW projects 3.7% as well, and Payscale suggests 3.5%. Although more moderate than the “red-hot” raises of the immediate post-pandemic era, these figures still reflect intense competition for employees with in-demand skills.

Meanwhile, heightened pay transparency remains front and center. Multiple U.S. states have rolled out regulations requiring salary ranges in job postings, while in Europe, the EU’s Pay Transparency Directive is poised to standardize disclosures across the continent by 2026.

Research from SHRM reiterates that this focus on transparent pay practices drives employers to reevaluate how they determine compensation. Where organizations previously may have used ad hoc data or salary histories, leaders are now seeking data-driven insights to align with market expectations—underlined by management’s need to avoid legal pitfalls and preserve employee trust. For third-parties, such as investors, consultants, and hedge funds, this has also opened up compensation data as another aspect of market intelligence.

Ready to elevate your workforce strategy? Book a demo to see how our real-time workforce analytics platform helps you stay competitive and make better organizational decisions.

The Strategic Rationale for Compensation Benchmarking: Retention & ROI

At its core, compensation benchmarking is the practice of comparing internal pay data with aggregated external data on roles, responsibilities, geographies, and sometimes even skill sets. Many modern teams lean on real-time data from platforms or large survey providers like Mercer, Radford, or WTW, ensuring that they understand precisely how their wage structures match—or fall short of—market trends.

A Harvard Business Review article co-authored by Zoë B. Cullen and others suggests that employers with ready access to accurate benchmarking data set compensate more consistently around the market median, yielding measurable gains in employee retention. The lesson: failing to benchmark thoroughly doesn’t simply risk overpaying—it can threaten your ability to keep talent, a crucial consideration when backfilling positions often costs 6–9 months of the departing employee’s salary. Also, in an era where half of employees, according to BambooHR research, struggle with rising costs of living, offering a below-market package can be a clear invitation for your best people to exit.

Yet it’s not merely a tactic to stave off attrition. Benchmarking also mitigates the risks of overspending. Especially as organizations expand into new regions or face margin pressures, having a precise grasp of the “going rate” for each role prevents hemorrhaging budgets on inflated salaries.

Real-Time Data Sources for Better Compensation Benchmarking

Historically, many business leaders acquired their salary data through manual surveys: painstaking processes requiring participant organizations to complete extensive spreadsheets, culminating months later in static insights. That worked when labor markets were slower to change. But with accelerating demands for specialized skills—think AI engineering or advanced data science—the time gap between locked-in salary surveys and real-time market shifts can be costly.

Today’s digital benchmarking tools aim to solve this challenge. Platforms integrate directly with a company’s HR information system to gather real-time compensation data, standardize job roles against universal frameworks, and pull anonymized, aggregated data on comparable positions. The outcome is a live view of how, for example, a P2 Engineer in Warsaw or a Customer Success Manager in Boston is paid at similarly sized, similarly funded firms.

The fact that about two-thirds of companies rely on live data solutions, according to various industry polls, suggests a growing consensus: fresh information is invaluable in responding swiftly to labor market shifts, especially if an organization has just faced an unexpected resignation or needs to open a new regional office on a tight timeline.

Integrating Skills-Based Pay: A Next-Level Compensation Benchmarking Tactic

As highlighted in SHRM’s most recent compensation trends report, one notable development is the rise of skills-based pay. Rather than strictly compensating people by title or tenure, leaders look to reward specific in-demand capabilities. It’s a logical evolution of pay benchmarking, acknowledging that not all data scientists are created equal, and not all tech roles are straightforward to align with a single “Software Engineer III” bracket.

Skills-based analyses can target more specialized peer groups when layered atop standard salary benchmarking. This is especially important in fast-growing fields—AI, cybersecurity, advanced analytics—where competition for talent is fierce and the supply pool remains constrained. By combining real-time benchmarking with a precise understanding of which skills carry the highest premium, organizations can pay more accurately for real value, and help employees visualize career paths. For example, they can illustrate how employees might upskill their way into higher compensation tiers through transparent presentations.

Impress Investors with Transparent, Data-Driven Compensation Benchmarking

For private equity and venture capital firms, compensation strategies matter as much to operational due diligence as revenue growth and product roadmaps. Overpaying management and employees siphons resources that could be funneled into expansion or product innovation; underpaying them translates into churn, which can derail entire business initiatives. Investors will probe how prospective portfolio companies set pay in many diligence processes. They recognize that a cohesive, data-backed compensation approach can strongly indicate mature leadership and stable operations.

Salary benchmarking isn’t just about retaining staff; it’s about ensuring accurate valuations. If payroll is bloated or if key roles seem systematically under-compensated, it may flag deeper cultural and operational issues. Real-time benchmark data and visible, well-structured pay frameworks offer confidence that management has one hand on cost control and the other on workforce well-being.

Boosting Brand and Culture Through Fair, Market-Aligned Compensation Benchmarking

Pay transparency legislation and rising employee expectations aren’t the only drivers of more thoughtful compensation benchmarking. Employer brand—and by extension, corporate culture—are inextricably tied to fairness and clarity. With 33% of employees reporting dissatisfaction with their current pay, according to recent BambooHR findings cited by SHRM, it’s little surprise that issues of equity frequently bubble up in exit interviews.

When employees see that salaries are aligned with credible external benchmarks and that there’s a coherent rationale for how pay levels are set, trust in leadership tends to increase. When they find glaring discrepancies or realize their pay is at the bottom decile of the market for no clear reason, resentment and turnover follow. Particularly in knowledge sectors where intangible know-how is essential, safeguarding culture often hinges on well-communicated pay decisions.

Looking Beyond Costs: Future-Proof Your Pay with Compensation Benchmarking

Over time, tight alignment with external pay rates often yields broader strategic benefits, including:

• Smoother Workforce Expansion: Leaders can identify the going rate for roles in new geographies and quickly set up sustainable payroll budgets.

• Regulatory Compliance: With state laws in the U.S. and impending EU directives, ignorance of fair-market pay may no longer be defensible.

• Elevated Negotiation Leverage: Being able to show a candidate or new hire real data behind an offer can defuse adversarial pay discussions.

• Reduced Legal and Reputational Risk: Transparent, data-driven pay decisions go a long way in mitigating allegations of pay discrimination or unconscious bias.

Meanwhile, the reorientation toward stable or slightly declining compensation growth—illustrated by pay raise projections leveling in the mid-three percent range—doesn’t lessen the need for benchmarking. If anything, this trend intensifies it: with wages no longer skyrocketing, an accurate read of the market is paramount to making prudent, competitively aligned offers.

Consultants & Investors: Why Compensation Benchmarking Is Key to Growth

From a consultancy perspective, sound compensation benchmarking can form a cornerstone of any organizational transformation project. Advising a client on cost optimization or on a post-acquisition integration without a firm handle on compensation data risks failing to spot misalignments—and thus missing out on potential margin or retention gains.

For investors, thorough benchmarking can reveal where a company may be bleeding capital or leaving critical roles underpaid in ways that undermine growth. In both scenarios, the overall message is the same: know exactly where you stand relative to the market. In 2025 and beyond, that clarity is less of a “nice to have” and more of a fundamental requirement.

Salary benchmarking has morphed into a board-level conversation, emblematic of a company’s operational sophistication and strategic foresight. As pay transparency rules tighten and economic conditions fluctuate, those who deploy the right benchmarking data—and apply it in a consistent, open manner—are positioned to strengthen employee loyalty, contain budgetary waste, and steer confidently through the next wave of workforce challenges.